They didn't know who they were portraying, I mean they sure knew who Jung and Freud are, but this characters were not them, they were just people who acted weird. All this movie will do is insult your intelligence by exposing you to shallow, passive, stupid, childish excuses for a psychological thriller. This was more focused on the dialogue and relationship between the characters. Have you ever witness a hysterical person having a crisis? Was this review helpful? Was this review helpful? I haven't, probably neither have you. It seemed like there were years in gaps between couple of scenes where there wasn't any. Well, darling, not this time. "A dangerous method"is a brilliant ,absorbing and thought provoking movie that boasts excellent performances by the three leading actors.The direction is great and Cronenberg once again shows his uncommon ability to tell a story in a very original way although the dialogs are sometimes hard to follow,probably due to its subject.But there are really breathtaking moments such as the scenes of the Spielrein therapy.This leads me to Knightley performance.It was a brave,shocking and terrific performance that it was criticized without a reason.I didn't catch all that hatred.She has always been so good("Pride e prejudice","Atonement" and "Never let me go")but here she left her comfort zone to bare herself and gives one of the most exiting performances of the year.Oscar worthy material.Fassbender was equally great in the role of Jung and it's a pleasure to watch this splendid rising A-list actor.Mortensen was good but I fear not as good as Fassbender and Knightley.Cassell is always Cassell.He's a good actor but he plays always the role of the daring man.I think that "A dangerous method" is one of the best movies of the year.It succeeds to transcend from his particular story to focus on the hidden instincts associated with the human nature.My vote is 8/10. Romance Check out some of the IMDb editors' favorites movies and shows to round out your Watchlist.Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. That said, I also think Keira Knightley was a mis-cast and Mortensen and Fassbender were as perfect as ever. I must admit, going into this film, I was rather excited; I've enjoyed both of David Cronenberg and Viggo Mortensen's previous collaborations and my interest in both Freudian psychology/psychoanalysis and Michael Fassbender practically guaranteed that I would be seeing this film. Another Those two films were among my favorite when they were released. At the beginning of the 20th Century modern-day psychoanalysis was coming to the forefront mainly through the work of penis-obsessed Sigmund Freud (Viggo Mortensen) and the more individualistic teachings of Carl Jung (Michael Fassbender). Could that be the reason why to some reviewers (including myself) the histrionics of Keira Knightley as a hysterical patient were embarrassing to watch on the screen? Rated R. Released on 10 Nov 2011. This isn't an action film with shocking scenes; it is more of a reflective film that analyzes the relationship between Freud, Jung, and Spielrein. All Titles TV Episodes Celebs Companies Keywords; Advanced Search. In the end we do not get the depth of each character, and the subtlety of their relationship. 15 out of 25 found this helpful. I'm so nauseated by this waste of time It's hard for me to continue writing. Suffering from hysteria, Sabina Spielrein is hospitalized under the care of Dr. Carl Jung who has begun using Dr. Sigmund Freud's talking cure with some of his patients. After getting into a serious car accident, a TV director discovers an underground sub-culture of scarred, omnisexual car-crash victims who use car accidents and the raw sexual energy they produce to try to rejuvenate his sex life with his wife.
In 1960s China, French diplomat Rene Gallimard falls in love with an opera singer, Song Liling - but Song is not at all who Gallimard thinks. Perhaps those high expectations were my downfall because this was a completely different movie from the previous two that Cronenberg had directed. Use the HTML below.
IMDbPro Watchlist. In August 1904, Sabina Spielrein (Keira Knightley) arrives at the Burghölzli, the pre-eminent psychiatric hospital in Zurich, Switzerland with a typical case of hysteria and begins a new course of treatment with the young Swiss doctor, Carl Jung (Michael Fassbender).
1. A deep rift develops between them when Jung diverges from Freud's belief that while psychoanalysis can reveal the cause of psychological problems it cannot cure the patient. Call them what you like - docudramas, faction, biopics - the vitality of films based on real-life events is usually constrained by historical facts. Caught up in the battle for primacy of science is neurotic sex-obsessed Sabina Spielrein (Keira Knightley), who as a patient / understudy to Carl Jung develops a deep relation with her mentor, which transcends into erotic extremities. 245 out of 275 found this helpful. Cronenberg has been a master of taking complex psychological themes and giving them terrifying conclusions, while making powerful statements on modern society. That sounds surprising and interesting, to say the very least but the movie as it turned out, was far from anything interesting to watch.Looking for some great streaming picks? "A Dangerous Method" is just another straitjacketed drama relating how the collegial friendship between Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung foundered on various differences.
Will feels certain he is close to a breakthrough and tests…Based on the literary classic by Thomas Hardy. Drama This enlarged scope versus this limited scope is indeed talked in the movie.
After studying medicine and child psychology in Zurich, graduating in 1911, and getting elected into the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society, she proposed an idea in 1912, namely that the human sexual drive contained both an instinct of destruction and an instinct of transformation.
Jw Marriott Lounge Hours, Audi A5 Price In Malaysia, Earths Cure Skincare, Poems By Currer, Ellis, And Acton Bell Pdf, Springfield Mo Population, Nutri Chopper Reviews,