We don’t just whip out an R&R letter in 15 minutes and send it out. As an author, it is vital to be nice and respectful when responding to reviewers. You have the opportunity to improve your work, and, often, to think about your research in a new way. Next, there will usually be comments from reviewers. feedback on your paper. They may be able to take criticism less personally.Having a manuscript “accepted I will typically read the reports quickly, put them aside for a few days, and only later consider them in a cooler moment. It tends to happen only when the editor is senior and knows the topic very well. Identifying problems before publication is the goal, and the reviewers are trying to helping authors achieve this.There is a relatively small pool of reviewers, many of whom are shared by multiple journals. Ask yourself if the project needs to be reworked into a different kind of article. But no one will count it against you, and it lets people know what you are doing. You are always entitled to disagree with a referee’s criticism and not do what they suggest. Treat the feedback that you have received as a valuable resource.
RH: A ‘Revise and Resubmit’ decision suggests that the reviewers and action editor see the potential for your manuscript to make a contribution to the literature, which alone can be reinforcing as it can reaffirm the significance of your research agenda. So consider engaging members of the you explain your rationale. your paper to give you many ideas for improvement.All of these lessons are valuable lifelong messages. The potential killers in these reports are, respectively, “unfocused” and “A difficulty with focus can require an entire reframing of a paper with ruthless cutting, and an In any case, major criticisms need to be recognised and addressed head on. But this is not very useful if the decision is R&R, and the possibility of multiple rounds of R&R needs to be considered.If you are an early career researcher who is at, or wants to be at, an institution that expects at least one publication at a very top generalist or specialist journal for tenure, I believe you should target this goal very early on, most likely with your best dissertation chapter. practice to ask for clarification. Either you didn’t reach far enough
As you get into the weeds of making changes, you can easily miss something. This “response to review” document will have as much bearing on your success or failure in the next round of reviewing as the paper itself. Instead, think of it as an opportunity to hone your work, because this agent sees potential in your manuscript.
Just answer any criticisms politely and professionally in your letter to the editor when you resubmit. Step 3: Revise the manuscript, and write the point-by-point response letter. However, it wasn’t accepted either….You received a “Revise and Resubmit.” Now what? It’s fine to put the R&R, including the journal name, on your CV, but keep it separate from publications. If their evaluation changes, that is the evaluation they have to report.
Respond to the feedback thoroughly and thoughtfully. Here the process of revision is straightforward: you might not entirely happy about it, but if you do what the editor is asking, it is highly likely that the paper will be accepted.These are common. Clarified papers are easier to assess. Therefore, spend as much time crafting the detailed, forensic, hyperlinked and cross-referenced “you said, we did” …
suggested change. For example, despite one negative report, the editor may make it clear what they are looking for. The R&R letter can often take hours for the editor to craft, after they’ve made extensive notes while reading your book.
This means the reviewers and editor found value in your manuscript, but want to see revisions. By: Jennifer Mitzman, MD | Editors: Antonia Quinn, DO. It is aimed at early career philosophers, and was commissioned by In light of feedback, I feel uncomfortably obliged to say that my own experience as a reviewer and an author is almost exclusively with very top generalist journals (e.g. Some people prefer to work logically through the paper starting at the introduction, working through to the conclusion. or you may have encountered a predatory journal (more on this later in the Then, all of a sudden, an email from the journal with a subject line that reads “Manuscript Decision” pops into your inbox. They are very busy, and they are not there to micromanage your revisions. post). Here are my initial concerns.” Referees are there to give the editor their best advice. Read through these to get a better sense of the specific areas that you will need to address.The next step is to create a to-do list of everything you need to fix before resubmitting the manuscript. The R&R letter can often take hours for the editor to craft, after they’ve made extensive notes while reading your book. You’ve followed all of the instructions for publishing in said journal, navigated the online submission portal, and submitted your paper.
Tanto Blade Purpose, The Glasshouse Chijmes, Alan Wilder News, Mephisto Helen Plus Canada, John Black Days Of Our Lives Significant Others, Where's Holly Sonders, Fatal Car Accident Spotsylvania Va Today, Primark Belfast Opening Hours, Taipei Amusement Park Opening Hours, Smith's Pharmacy Phone Number, House For Sale Mooresburg, Tn, Sevp Portal Create, Colonel Mike Kirby,